Я с интересом прочитала вашу дискуссию про Сизифа и всё время смутно чувствовала, что в дискуссии (в рассказе - как я его запомнила) чего-то не хватает - может он не хочет, чтобы камень упал на кого-то? Вот и катит. Подумала, что надо освежить в памяти миф (и чтобы не зависнуть на час в сети - сразу пошла к Чату Джипитиевич. Прочитала, и подумала (даже забыла про все его деяния) - Сизиф - это такой "умник", который хотел хорошо править и не давать слабых богам в обиду - ну его и порешили. И это мне прям инсайтом шибануло со страшной силой! Как если Сизиф камень на макушку бросил - это же относительно недавний случай из новостей. Ну не буду тут писать имён, кто понял, тот понял.
Цитата
Sisyphus, a figure from ancient Greek mythology, was the founder and king of Corinth, a city known for its wealth and cunning. Though he was a shrewd and clever ruler, his intelligence often led him into trouble with the gods.
One of the most famous stories about Sisyphus involves his encounter with Thanatos, the personification of Death. Sisyphus, seeking to avoid his own demise, managed to trick Thanatos. According to one version, Sisyphus captured Thanatos and chained him, preventing anyone from dying. This caused chaos among the gods, as the natural order was disrupted. Eventually, Ares, the god of war, freed Thanatos, restoring the balance.
Another notable story involves Sisyphus's deceit of Zeus, the king of the gods. Sisyphus witnessed Zeus kidnapping the river nymph Aegina, daughter of the river god Asopus. In exchange for a spring to provide fresh water to his city, Sisyphus revealed to Asopus who had taken his daughter. Zeus, furious at this betrayal, decided to punish Sisyphus for his treachery.
Sisyphus eventually faced his death, but he had a plan to escape the underworld. Before dying, he instructed his wife, Merope, not to perform the traditional burial rites. In the underworld, Sisyphus complained to Persephone, the queen of the underworld, that he had not been properly buried, convincing her to allow him to return to the world of the living to correct the matter. However, once back among the living, Sisyphus refused to return to the underworld, living out the rest of his life in defiance of the gods.
Eventually, the gods had enough of Sisyphus's cunning and deceit. Upon his final death, he was condemned to an eternal punishment. Zeus decreed that Sisyphus would be forced to roll a large boulder up a steep hill in the underworld. However, every time he reached the top, the boulder would roll back down, forcing Sisyphus to start over. This endless, futile task was his punishment for defying the gods, and it would last for eternity.
Thus, Sisyphus became a symbol of futility and endless struggle, forever striving to complete an impossible task, only to see his efforts erased with each attempt. The myth of Sisyphus has endured through the ages, offering a powerful metaphor for the human condition and the search for meaning in a seemingly indifferent universe.
А за одно и спросила - что бы ответили разные философы - Почему Сизиф катит камень?
Цитата
The myth of Sisyphus has intrigued philosophers for generations, and each thinker might offer a unique perspective on why Sisyphus rolls the boulder. Here's how various philosophers and philosophical traditions might respond to this question:
Albert Camus (Existentialism/Absurdism)
Camus famously used the story of Sisyphus to illustrate the concept of the absurd, the idea that life is inherently meaningless and humans must find or create their own meaning. According to Camus, Sisyphus rolls the boulder because that is his fate, and he ultimately embraces his task with acceptance, knowing that the struggle itself is his source of meaning. Camus ends his essay with the notion that "one must imagine Sisyphus happy."
Jean-Paul Sartre (Existentialism)
Sartre would likely say that Sisyphus rolls the boulder because he has the freedom to define his existence through his actions. Even in the face of absurdity or punishment, Sisyphus's constant effort represents a form of existential choice. The rolling of the boulder becomes an expression of Sisyphus's own freedom and commitment to his fate.
Friedrich Nietzsche (Existentialism/Eternal Return)
Nietzsche might view Sisyphus's task through the lens of his concept of "eternal return." The idea that Sisyphus's punishment is endless and cyclical could be seen as the ultimate test of one's ability to affirm life and find joy in eternal recurrence. Nietzsche might suggest that Sisyphus rolls the boulder because he can choose to embrace his fate and turn suffering into an act of self-overcoming.
Immanuel Kant (Deontology)
Kant could view the rolling of the boulder as a duty that Sisyphus must fulfill, even if it appears to be futile. The concept of duty for its own sake is central to Kant's philosophy, so Sisyphus's task could represent an extreme form of moral obligation, where the reason for rolling the boulder lies in fulfilling a command or adhering to a principle.
Karl Marx (Historical Materialism)
From a Marxist perspective, the rolling of the boulder might symbolize the alienation and repetitive labor experienced by workers under capitalism. Marx would see Sisyphus's labor as indicative of the dehumanizing aspects of a system that compels workers to perform meaningless tasks without a sense of fulfillment or ownership. In this view, Sisyphus rolls the boulder because he has no choice within the framework of his societal context.
Epicurus (Epicureanism)
Epicurus, focusing on the pursuit of pleasure and avoidance of pain, might argue that Sisyphus rolls the boulder because he hasn't yet found the right path to happiness. Epicurus could interpret the myth as a warning against unnecessary suffering and advocate for finding ways to minimize pain and maximize tranquility, suggesting that Sisyphus should seek a way out of his punishment.
These are just a few interpretations of why Sisyphus might roll the boulder. Each perspective offers a unique lens on the human condition, futility, and the search for meaning in life.
А как Сизиф дорвался до такой жизни? Это уже другой вопрос.